Philistines Giving Goliath His Due Marco Polo Monographs Shangrila Publications by Neal Bierling

Translate to French
German

Translate to German
Italian

Translate to Italian

Translate to Portuguese
Spanish

Translate to Spanish

MPM7: Philistines: Giving Goliath His Due
by Neal Bierling
Contents ________________________________________ [i-xxiv] Color Plates [xxv-xlii] Black/White Plates [1-4] Foreword [5-14] Introduction [15-22] 1: Philistines in Scripture [23-44] 2: Ekron: The Archaeological Record [45-67} 3: Origins of the Philistines [68-123] 4: Philistines from Joshua to David [124-147] 5: Philistines from David to Solomon [148-174] 6: Philistines from Solomon to Hezekiah [175-202] 7: Philistines from Hezekiah to Josiah [203-221] 8: Final Destruction of Philistia Prof. Neal Bierling began his archaeological dig adventures back in 1972 at Tel Gezer in Israel, directed by Joe Seger. Neal joined Gezer�s supervisory staff under Sy Gitin in 1973.	ORDER NOW Who were the Philistines? Were they as bad as the Bible claims? Here we divide myth from fact! ISBN 0-9714683-4-6 Cloth Bound Price $39.50 US ISBN 0-9714683-5-4 Paperback Price $31.00 US Single Orders Volume Orders Excerpt Below
REVIEW I read a lot of books, but sometimes one comes along that really surprises me with its excellence, and this is one of those books. In this book, Professor Neil Bierling presents up-to-date information on those bad guys of the Old Testament, the Philistines. Combining the Biblical references to the Philistines with recent archeological finds, Prof. Bierling fleshes out the Philistines, following their history from their origination in the Aegean(!), through their arrival in Egypt and Canaan, their interaction with the Israelites, and on to their final destruction by the Babylonian Empire. This is an excellent resource for any student of the Bible who has wondered who the Philistines really were. The author uses the Biblical references to them in a skillful way, showing where the archaeological finds have complemented the Biblical narrative, and where they have not. Indeed, he does not simply follow the Bible (though the Bible does give the book its organization), but follows the history of the Philistines as they interacted with such Middle Eastern nations as Egypt and Assyria. So, let me just sum up by saying that this is a great book on the Philistines, one that is sure to amplify your understanding of who they were. Kurt A. Johnson (Marseilles, Illinois, USA) In 1981, Neal was an assistant to Adam Zertal at Tel Lachish, a site directed by David Ussishkin. Neal joined Tel Miqne-Ekron�s staff for its initial summer season in 1984 and rose to Associate Field Archaeologist by 1996. Due to his work at Ekron, Neal was able to publish the excavation�s Volume VII, report of finds in Field X. It was during the 1996 season that a lengthy inscription was uncovered, which confirmed that Tel Miqne-Ekron was the Old Testament site of Ekron. Since Ekron, Neal worked at Petra, Jordan, Jordan�s most intriguing and exotic site and home to Esau�s tribe (Edom), followed by the Nabateans. Paul likely visited (and preached at) Petra, and in the 1990�s, Petra was even visited by Indiana Jones.

EXCERPTS

INTRODUCTION
 
Prior to the excavations at Tel Miqne-Ekron, which began in 1981, material data on the Philistines were sparse at best. Of the five capital Philistine cities mentioned in the Bible (Ashdod, Ashkelon, Ekron, Gath, and Gaza) only one, Ashdod, had been extensively excavated.  The Ashdod dig has yielded excellent material finds from the Philistines, though its Philistine phase is only one of several strata being excavated.  Gaza, part of the Gaza Strip, is so densely populated today that excavation there is all but impossible (see Plate XIX, Fig. 69).  Gath (Tell es-Safi) has not been excavated since late in the nineteenth century.  Ashkelon is presently being excavated, but it has so many occupational strata besides Philistine ones that it will be some time before a workable mass of data is available for interpretative work.  (Occupational strata, in contrast to strata containing only soil and rocks from erosion, are permeated with debris and artifacts of human activity.)
Tel Miqne-Ekron, a fifty-acre site, is one of the largest archaeological sites from the biblical era. It is today quickly becoming the richest field of all biblical-era Philistine excavations. The soil there is filled with Philistine pottery. Stub your toe, and chances are you will uncover a piece of that pottery. What makes Tel Miqne-Ekron particularly exciting is that its occupational strata are primarily those of the Philistine period. The more than one hundred olive oil presses that the current excavation has already uncovered are all presses from the Philistines. No other site in the Near East has presented archaeologists with such a plethora of oil presses. Philistine Ekron in the seventh century B.C.E. must have been one of the largest centers of olive oil production in its day. But more importantly, in that same stratum, in conjunction with the oil presses and sometimes in the same room, four-horned �Israelite� style altars have also been found (see Plate VII, Fig. 19; Plate XVIII, Figs. 65 and 66).
Finding these two kinds of artifacts together, one totally secular and the other always thought of as religious in nature, sheds light on the ancient Near Eastern process of oil production. It also helps us understand Amos�s indictment of God�s people in chapter 6:4�7, where he refers to a pagan ritual and condemns the impious luxury of self-anointing and using �the finest oils.�
Clearly, the Tel Miqne-Ekron excavations and others of the recent past have yielded the best insights to date concerning the world of the biblical Philistines. However, even more compelling is the realization that these insights also give us a better understanding of the social and religious life of God�s people as presented to us in Amos, and elsewhere in the Old Testament. 
	Ten years have passed since my first book on this subject, Giving Goliath His Due.  The time is right for a fresh look at this subject, since discoveries concerning the world of the Philistines in the Levant have increased tremendously since that first edition.  The discoveries and subsequent publications present an even stronger case for what I presented back in 1992: that the Philistines were part of an alliance (confederation) of peoples that left the Aegean area (including Mycenae, Crete, and Troy), traveled to Cyprus before settling in Canaan.  Their move to Canaan happened near the end of the 13th century and the beginning of the 12th B.C.E., which was about the same time that the Israelites were also settling in the hill country of Canaan, but coming from the east instead of by sea.  The subsequent clash of the two peoples in the 12th century B.C.E. resulted in the displacement of local Canaanites (Later in what is now Lebanon, the Canaanites became known as the Phoenicians.). 
	Stager (1995, 332), citing others, presents a list of criteria to �prove� that a migration of peoples from one homeland to another locale did occur. ...


CHAPTER ONE

The Philistines in Scripture

Before looking to the data collected in the various excavations of the last few years at Philistine sites, a brief review of the biblical presentation of the Philistines is in order. From the days of Joshua to those of Zechariah the prophet, the Philistines were generally viewed by the Israelites as �the enemy�. There are some exceptions to this portrayal, but these exceptions frequently haven�t been widely recognized because of the several different names biblical writers have used in reference to the people of Philistia.
To begin then, what did the Old Testament writers mean when they wrote the word �Philistine�? By way of comparison, remember that during the Exodus, non-Israelites or �aliens� joined the tribes of Israel (Exod. 12:38; Num. 11:4; Josh. 8:35). This entire aggregate of people, Israelites and non-Israelites, became known as Israel. At a later time, when David was fleeing from Saul, he too was joined by non-Israelites (1 Sam. 26:6). In First Samuel 29:3, David and his entire company nonetheless are called Hebrews. Similarly, throughout the Old Testament the word Philistine is invariably used in its sociopolitical sense rather than with an ethnic or a linguistic meaning.
The �Sea Peoples� of the Egyptian records included the Philistines mentioned in the Bible. They had settled along the coast south of the Mount Carmel range and had formed a new federation of five capital cities: Gaza, Ashkelon, Ashdod, Gath, and Ekron. This federation took on the name of its dominant group, the Philistines, and that name lives on today in the place name Palestine.
The earliest uses of the word Philistine in the Bible are in Genesis 21 and 26.  In Genesis 21 Abimelech and the captain of his host, Phicol, left the land they had shared with Abraham and �returned to the land of the Philistines.� In chapter 26, Isaac, due to the duress of a famine, traveled to �Abimelech king of the Philistines.�
The use of the name Philistines in these chapters of Genesis may indicate an earlier wave of raiders who had come by sea and settled in the area (but not yet �found� by archaeologists). It is also possible that a copyist, some centuries after the writing of the original chapter, anachronistically added or substituted a word he himself had grown accustomed to using with reference to the territory.
Abimelech, whose name is Semitic, was king of the Philistines. His captain, Phicol, had a non-Semitic name. Both are central characters in these early stories. Perhaps Phicol was a foreigner and the commander of a foreign mercenary troop. Clearly, the Bible leaves as many questions that it raises unanswered, and questions about the backgrounds of these men also remain. In any event, there were centuries between the Philistines in the stories of Abraham�s day and the Philistines with whom the descendants of Joshua were embroiled.
In Exodus 13:17 God did not allow the Israelites, as they left Egypt, to go to the Promised Land �by way of the land of the Philistines, although that was nearer.� In Exodus 23:31 God, at Mount Sinai, stated: �I will set your borders from the Red Sea to the sea of the Philistines.� In Joshua 13:1-2, with the Israelites now in Palestine, we read, �Now Joshua was old and advanced in years; and the Lord said to him, �You are old and advanced in years, and very much of the land still remains to be possessed. This is the land that still remains: all the regions of the Philistines��  These indications in the Bible, when taken together with Egyptian historical records of the thirteenth to twelfth centuries B.C.E., provide a specific starting date for Israel�s history of conflict with the Philistines (Malamat 1982; Frerichs 1997).
The biblical text does not record that Joshua himself directly battled against Philistines. In Joshua 13 and succeeding passages, however, we read that the Philistines are present on the coastal plain and were perceived as a threat that needed to be driven out. The five chief cities of the Philistines are cited as cities yet to be captured. They are identified as part of Israel�s tribal inheritance. The allotment of land for Judah is described in chapter 15. Verses 10-12 mention Timnah (where Samson�s wife came from) and Ekron. Verse 31 mentions Ziklag as part of Judah�s southern border, the city later given to David by Achish, king of Philistine Gath. Verses 45-47 mention that Ekron, Ashdod, and Gaza, down to the Mediterranean Sea, were all to belong to Judah, though in fact the territory was never successfully held and the children of Judah have had to share the land �to this day.�
In Joshua 19:1-9, the territory that is to be Simeon�s is described. Ziklag is included here as well. In chapter 19:43, Timnah and Ekron are again mentioned, though this time as belonging to the tribe of Dan. Because the sons of Dan �had difficulty taking possession of their territory� (19:47 NIV), they later left this their allotted tribal land and moved to an area north of the Sea of Galilee; there capturing Laish and renaming it Dan (Josh. 19:47; Judg. 18:29). This move probably occurred sometime after the Samson stories described in Judges 18 and following.
Judges 1:18 says of the Philistines and their cities: �Judah took Gaza with its territory, Ashkelon with its territory, and Ekron with its territory.� Although a capture of these cities occurred, their occupation was problematic, as the following verse reveals: �but [Judah] could not drive out the inhabitants of the plain, because they had chariots of iron.� It seems that Israel was unable to hold on to these Philistine territories for any length of time.
Judges 4 and 5 record the well-known battle of Deborah against Jabin, king of Hazor, which is in northern Israel. Perhaps most intriguing with regard to this piece of history is the question that also may serve as an index to the life and times of that era: Who was this general of Jabin called Sisera? Who was this man known even today for his iron chariots? Linguists tell us that Sisera is neither a Hebrew nor a Canaanite name. It is suggested he might have been one of the Sea Peoples of whom the Philistines were a part. We do know that some of the Sea Peoples had settled along the coast north of the Mount Carmel range (M. Dothan 1989, 63). In his iron chariots, Sisera at least possessed their technology. Additionally, he is said to have been from Harosheth Haggoyim, which means Harosheth of the Gentiles. This is believed to have been somewhere in the Jezreel Valley (Singer 1994, 320), near where he gathered his forces to do battle with the Israelites and the place to which his surviving charioteers fled in terror after the battle.  
In Judges 10, as background to the Jephthah story, the Philistines are mentioned again, though they and their gods are not the center of consideration. The writer of Judges here lists the enemies to whom the Lord delivered the Israelites for a period of eighteen years, because they had fallen away from serving him, because they had �served the Baals and the Ashtaroth, the gods of Syria, the gods of Sidon, the gods of Moab, the gods of the Ammonites, and the gods of the Philistines� (10:6 RSV). Though the Ammonites were Jephthah�s direct enemy according to the story, verse 7 reads: �And the anger of the Lord was kindled against Israel, and he sold them into the hand of the Philistines, and into the hand of the Ammonites� (RSV).
In Judges 13, the story of the Philistines is picked up again in the Samson saga. Placed in the time prior to the move of the tribe of Dan north of the Sea of Galilee (Judg. 18), the story shows Samson living in proximity to the Philistines and able to move freely among them (Judg. 14:1, 14:5; 16:1). Very likely this freedom of movement was possible because the Hebrews were subjects of the Philistines (14:4; 15:11). For some reason, not all five of the chief Philistine cities are mentioned in this account. Even Ekron, the city closest to Timnah, is not named directly. However, Delilah is said to have been from the valley of Sorek (Judg. 16:4). The scenes with her may have occurred near or in Ekron, which is in this valley. In addition, the Philistine lords, presumably including the lord of Ekron, did come to Delilah, and therefore Ekron would have been involved. Ashkelon lost thirty of its young men at the end of Samson�s wedding party in Timnah, and Gaza lost its gates to Samson after he was locked inside. The story concludes with Samson asking the Lord God, �Let me die with the Philistines� (16:30), and Samson then kills more Philistines in his death than he had slain during his lifetime. With the demise of Samson, the Philistines exited from the biblical picture until the Samuel stories.
In First Samuel 4 the Philistines captured the Ark of the Covenant in the second of two consecutive battles with the Israelites.  �So the Philistines fought; Israel was defeated, and they fled, everyone to his home. There was a very great slaughter, for there fell of Israel thirty thousand foot soldiers� (4:10). Israel�s ark of the covenant went on a seven-month tour of Philistine cities. The five chief cities of the Philistines or their rulers are mentioned here and in following chapters, as are the numerous encounters that Samuel and Saul had with the Philistines. These struggles led to David�s encounter with Goliath, recorded in 1 Samuel 17. After the death of Goliath, the Philistines were chased �as far as Gath and the gates of Ekron� (v. 52).
All but three of the remaining chapters in First Samuel contain references to the Philistines and detail their encounters with Saul, Jonathan, and David. We read how David eventually sought refuge with the Philistine Achish, ruler of Gath, and evidently swore loyalty to him. The city of Ziklag was given to David as a reward for this loyalty. From this city fortress, David made his many forays against the enemies of Israel, the Philistines in particular, and in all of these ventures he left no survivors who might report back to Achish. Other Philistine rulers, however, did not trust David, and in preparation for their battle against Saul sent David back to Ziklag. Upon his return there, he found that the Amalekites, who had also taken his wives and children captive, had sacked his Philistine city.
Second Samuel contains few references to the Philistines. These report David�s final battles against them in his efforts to subjugate the traditional enemies of his people.
First Chronicles provides some additional detail. First Chronicles 11:15-19 records the story of a Philistine garrison at Bethlehem at a time when David, fleeing from Saul, was out in the wilderness. David longed for water from his hometown well; the well at Bethlehem�s gate, and three of his warriors risked their lives by breaking through the Philistine camp in order to get some of that water. We read in later chapters that after David was anointed king over all Israel the Philistines attacked him, evidently fearing his new independence. David defeated them, and the Chronicler adds, �and at David�s command they [the captured Philistine gods] were burned.� While capturing Gath and Gezer, David fought and killed their giants, some of whom were reported to have six fingers and toes (1 Chron. 14:8-17; 18:1; 20:4-8).
But First Chronicles also allows a view of the Philistines often overlooked. The Cherethites, Pelethites, Gittites, and Carites were all somehow part of the Philistine federation.  Nonetheless, they formed David�s personal bodyguard, the bodyguard that remained loyal to him, even when almost all others had deserted him for various reasons.  In Second Samuel 15:18ff., when Absalom forced his father to flee Jerusalem, this bodyguard fled with David. Some one hundred years later, this same royal bodyguard, in loyalty to King David�s family, helped install the seven-year-old Joash on David�s throne in Jerusalem, in place of King Ahab�s daughter, Athaliah (2 Kings 11).
The references to the Philistines in First and Second Kings, Second Chronicles, and several of the prophetical books covering the period of the kings after David are few in number. First Kings 8:9 and Second Chronicles 5:10 may contain the first references in this period, although they are indirect. They concern Solomon and his moving the Ark of the Covenant into the great temple he constructed in Jerusalem. Both verses mention that by then the ark contained only the two stone tablets. In mentioning what the ark contained the writers obliquely remind their audience of the missing articles�the golden container of manna and Aaron�s staff. In this way, they subtly remind readers of the Israelites� long, troubled history with the Philistines who had captured this ark in the days of Eli and Samuel.
In these passing sentences, the writers might also be reminding their audience why the people of Israel in that day intuitively despised the Philistines.  Not only had these pestilent neighbors killed their judge Samson, but also during those final days of the judges they had captured the ark of the covenant and may have either kept or destroyed the golden pot of manna and Aaron�s staff�these artifacts were reminders of how the Lord God provided for His people while they wandered through the wilderness. To be reminded of this much was also to remember it was also the Philistines who, in effect, killed their first king, Saul, and desecrated his body on the walls of Beth-shean.
The specific references to the Philistines in the books of the Kings show that the writers had learned to recognize a separate Philistine territory. At times this territory was under the control of Israel or Judah, and at times it was seen as an obviously independent region (1 Kings 4:21; 15:27; 2 Kings 8:2-3). Solomon ruled at least to the borders of Philistia (2 Chron. 9:26), but, some sixty years later (circa 870 B.C.E.), we see the Philistines listed as one of the groups bearing tribute to King Jehoshaphat of Judah (2 Chron. 17:11). Of singular interest is the passage in Second Kings 1:2-17, where King Ahab�s successor, Ahaziah, a contemporary of Jehoshaphat of Judah, sent men to the Philistine city of Ekron to consult their god Baal-zebub. Ahaziah was grievously ill and wished to ask of the Philistine god whether he would recover. This passage is significant because it illustrates the influence of the Philistines in Israel at that time and because it demonstrates the validity of the Lord, Israel�s God, against a powerless and unavailing Philistine god, Baal-zebub. (This will be discussed further in chapter 6.)
In Second Chronicles 21 we read that Jehoshaphat�s son, Jehoram of Judah (849-843 B.C.E.), the king who married Athaliah, King Ahab�s and Queen Jezebel�s daughter, had difficulties with numerous enemies during his reign. Among the enemies that the Lord raised up against him were the Philistines (21:16). Some fifty years later, during the eighth century B.C.E., King Uzziah of Judah was able to defeat the Philistines of Gath and Ashdod (2 Chron. 26:6-7), and Gath is not mentioned again in biblical history after Second Chronicles 26. King Uzziah (783-742) reigned during the period of the prophet Amos, circa 750 B.C.E., whose stark and memorable prophecy warrants a more thorough discussion in a later chapter (see pp. 194-98).
During the reign of Uzziah�s grandson, the wicked Ahaz (735-715), the Philistines were able to capture several towns of Judah (2 Chron. 28:18-19). The writer of the Chronicles makes dramatically clear that the Lord allowed this to happen as the result of Ahaz�s wickedness: �And the Philistines had made raids on the cities in the Shephelah and the Negeb of Judah, and had taken Beth-shemesh, Aijalon, Gederoth, Soco with its villages, Timnah with its villages, and Gimzo with its villages; and they settled there. For the Lord brought Judah low because of King Ahaz of Israel. . . .�
These were the days of Isaiah, who uttered several messianic messages during this tempestuous reign (e.g., Isa. 7:14). In 2:6, Isaiah presents a negative portrait of the Philistines when he refers to �soothsayers like the Philistines.� In 9:12, after we encounter the well known messianic passage �For to us a child is born, to us a son is given� (v. 6 RSV), Isaiah emphasizes that the Lord has used the Philistines to punish Israel for its wickedness. There is another shift in chapter 11. Here Isaiah states that both Israel and Judah together with the Messiah will �swoop down on the backs of the Philistines in the west� (11:14). In 14:28-32, a message to the Philistines is specifically dated to the year King Ahaz died, circa 715 B.C.E.: �Wail, O gate; cry, O city; melt in fear, O Philistia, all of you! For smoke comes out of the north, and there is no straggler in its ranks� (Isa. 14:31).
The final references to the Philistines in Chronicles concern Judah�s King Ahaz. The good king, Hezekiah, circa 700 B.C.E., follows Ahaz and in 2 Kings 18:8 we read that Hezekiah was able to defeat the �Philistines as far as Gaza and its territory.� (See chapter 7 for further discussion.) This is the latest obvious mention of the Philistines in the Old Testament history of the kingdoms.
The Book of Jeremiah, covering the final years of Judah�s existence as an independent nation, circa 600 B.C.E., becomes our next focus. In a descriptive passage detailing the wrath of the Lord, Jeremiah 25:17ff., the Philistines and their cities Ashkelon, Gaza, Ekron, and Ashdod are mentioned in the catalogue of peoples destined for annihilation. Chapter 47 describes specifically the manner in which destruction will come to the Philistines. Perhaps this chapter in Jeremiah underscores the event that occurred during the reign of King Josiah, whose death is described in both Second Kings 23 and Second Chronicles 35. An Egyptian army led by Pharaoh Neco was enroute to wage war against Carchemish to the north in an effort to aid Assyria against the rising power of Babylon. Josiah not only was unsuccessful in his efforts to stop Neco, but also was fatally wounded by Egyptian archers. His death prefigures the loss of independence that Judah was about to suffer. Jeremiah is reported by the writer of the Chronicles to have composed a lament for Josiah (2 Chron. 35:25) and to have prophesied the destruction of Philistia by Babylon (Jer. 47).
The writings of Zephaniah and Ezekiel could only have been produced during this time of despair so poignantly introduced in the lamentations of Jeremiah. Judah and Jerusalem were going to be destroyed by the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar. In his complaint, Ezekiel explains that because the Philistines had sought the destruction of Judah, they as well would be destroyed. Zephaniah, prophesying during the days of Josiah (ca. 620 B.C.E.), corroborates this prophecy of Ezekiel, saying that the Philistine cities would be destroyed and their lands would become the pasture land for the remnant of Judah: �For Gaza shall be deserted, and Ashkelon shall become a desolation; Ashdod�s people shall be driven out at noon, and Ekron shall be uprooted. Ah, inhabitants of the seacoast, you nation of the Cherethites! The word of the Lord is against you, O Canaan, land of the Philistines; and I will destroy you until no inhabitant is left. And you, O seacoast, shall be pastures, meadows for shepherds and folds for flocks� (Zeph. 2:4-6).
The final reference to the Philistines in the Old Testament is found in the writing of Zechariah, a prophet who lived and worked circa 520 B.C.E. It is likely that he was a contemporary of the prophet Haggai. In chapter 9 of Zechariah�s work, the destruction of the remaining Philistine cities is graphically and matter-of-factly foretold. Zechariah�s words summarize what had become the dominant biblical sensibility regarding the Philistines:

The word of the Lord is against the land of Hadrach and will rest upon Damascus. For to the Lord belongs the capital of Aram, as do all the tribes of Israel; Hamath also, which borders on it, Tyre and Sidon, though they are very wise. Tyre has built itself a rampart, and heaped up silver like dust, and gold like the dirt of the streets. But now, the Lord will strip it of its possessions and hurl its wealth into the sea, and it shall be devoured by fire.
Ashkelon shall see it and be afraid; Gaza too, and shall writhe in anguish; Ekron also, because its hopes are withered. The king shall perish from Gaza; Ashkelon shall be uninhabited; a mongrel people shall settle in Ashdod, and I will make an end of the pride of Philistia. I will take away its blood from its mouth, and its abominations from between its teeth; it too shall be a remnant for our God; it shall be like a clan in Judah, and Ekron shall be like the Jebusites. [Zech. 9:1-7]

From this brief outline of the Old Testament use of the word Philistine from the thirteenth to the sixth centuries B.C.E. we turn to a synopsis of the archaeological record at Tel Miqne-Ekron, which covers roughly the same period. After a discussion of the origins of the Philistines (Chap. 3), I will examine how the archaeological record of various Philistine sites sheds light on and meshes with the biblical record.


Philistines: Donnant � Goliath Son D� (Arch�ologique)

Philistines: Goliath Seine Schuld Geben (Aufzeichnung)

Philistines: Dando A Goliath Il Suo Debito (L'Annotazione)

Philistines: Dando A Goliath Sua D�vida (O Registro)

Philistines: Dando A Goliath Su Deuda (El Expediente Arqueol�gico)

TOP